@Amit63390 · X

@harryjwang · X

I've used many of the major conference systems. Plenty still have docs as an unsearchable static site — or worse, as PDFs that stopped tracking the product three versions ago. Somehow, still true in 2026. We took an AI-first path with instead. Our docs are generated from the codebase itself. A custom Claude Code skill writes each page and retakes the screenshots whenever a feature changes — so the docs don't drift from the product. Every page still gets reviewed by a human before it ships. Now you can talk to them, too. We just shipped "Ask AI" over our docs: This feature also turned out to be a nice teaching case for agentic RAG vs. classic RAG: • Classic RAG: chunk → embed → vector DB → retrieve once, by fixed rules • Agentic RAG: hand the model a search tool and let it drive — write a query, read the results, rewrite, retry At more than 100 pages, still no vector database needed. And every answer cites the exact page it came from. #Age

u/Zyron_X · Reddit

I built a service for people to use Codex API without 5-hour limit disruption I built a small service for people who use the OpenAI Codex API regularly and want more predictable usage without the 5-hour or weekly limits. It currently provides: Frontier OpenAI models (GPT 5.6 family included) Managed API key Monthly usage budgets depending to plan No 5-hour limit No weekly limit Under the hood, it is built on top of an open-source project and proxies requests to

@aviralgarg05 · X

Here's what you get on One toolkit. Every design task.

@rrvindhya · X

Building DocFlow ( — a SaaS that helps HR teams and training institutes generate personalized offer letters & certificates in bulk, with QR verification and one-click email delivery.

felixdoerp · HN

Hi HN, The one thing AI reliably does is generate noise. Half the tools I see launch are just machines for producing more noise across more channels. And people are starting to see this in the form of emails in their inboxes as spam filters are struggling. There used to be a useful signal in email: the effort a sender put into customizing a message was a rough proxy for how relevant it actually was. AI killed that. Now it's customized slop with the appearance of effort with none of the cost. It is painful that the open internet / open channels have been abused like this. Captchainbox applies the idea of proof-of-work to email. If a sender is willing to do a bit of work to reach you, the message is more likely to be worth your time and the sender more likely to be real. The work is a traditional captcha. You can also set a pay-to-deliver amount if you want more friction. The proceeds of the delivery payment after transaction costs go to the Internet Archive and the EFF. The tool curr

@KenziChenBuilds · X

Hey! Developer behind Always looking for feedback to make it better.

@propelio_app · X

Hey man, Building Propelio, proposals for freelancers Let’s connect!

mhmt_dmr · HN

MCP Gateway – Turn existing APIs and databases into MCP servers

@abhinav__dubey · X

Heyy Yooo! Building one link that helps SMBs go from first pitch to fully paid process, no juggling four tools to get there.

@RElharrak39428 · X

u/Melodic-Living4805 · Reddit

Roast my Agentic Platform Been building this platform on the side for about a year would love to hear if the messaging is clear and what your first impressions are. Are you curious ? confused . impressed etc ? https://pindown.ai/ submitted by /u/Melodic-Living4805 to r/microsaas [link] [comments]