craigsmitham

@fugteapp · X

which empowers nontechnical users to be able to customize code generated by AI or developer, and be able to share and embed it to the website they are already using

@BayofDomain · X

@kngkng182542 · X

If you're paying for Canny, give FeedLog a look. Same workflow for collecting feedback and managing feature requests, but free during launch.

@duke_can_c_u · X

Hi I’m the founder of a content collaboration platform for teams and creators, with focus on editorial workflows. Always looking to connect with people passionate about content, SaaS, and building great products.

@Utsabpanday · X

othmanosx · HN

I still don't like the fact that AI is adding more stuff for us to read, it's accelerating the code production but slowing down the code review. I built my own code reviewer as well ( https://pyor.review/ ), surfacing the important stuff first is the right track, but adding more stuff to read is daunting, but asking AI to just point you to what you need to focus on and skim the noise is what I'm leaning more towards.

@janiraj88 · X

fran-mora · HN

I gave 5 AI coding agents one prompt: grow a banana plant through its whole life in three.js: sprout, leaves, flower, fruit, rot, then pups that restart the loop. It's deceptively simple and yet very hard to get right from procedural code: you have to write working three.js and understand how the plant is actually built; how it hangs, ages and decays. Get the biology wrong and the code renders something weird. These are agents, not bare models (Claude Code and Codex for now). They can use tools, including playwright to check their work and improve it.

@elvan_hq · X

Feedback surveys with AI summaries for SaaS and ecom teams. NPS, CSAT, CES in minutes, not days. Built for the one-person CX stack who doesn't have time for enterprise tools.

@mukparekh · X

I built tool for fun. roast website Free. No signup

@SajidAbuba74138 · X

A tool for developers