@syedbalkhi · X

@askjames_co · X

@harryjwang · X

I've used many of the major conference systems. Plenty still have docs as an unsearchable static site — or worse, as PDFs that stopped tracking the product three versions ago. Somehow, still true in 2026. We took an AI-first path with instead. Our docs are generated from the codebase itself. A custom Claude Code skill writes each page and retakes the screenshots whenever a feature changes — so the docs don't drift from the product. Every page still gets reviewed by a human before it ships. Now you can talk to them, too. We just shipped "Ask AI" over our docs: This feature also turned out to be a nice teaching case for agentic RAG vs. classic RAG: • Classic RAG: chunk → embed → vector DB → retrieve once, by fixed rules • Agentic RAG: hand the model a search tool and let it drive — write a query, read the results, rewrite, retry At more than 100 pages, still no vector database needed. And every answer cites the exact page it came from. #Age

@XRmic_app · X

is an alternative to reddit. Users can get donation for high quality post.

@nameisnotanoun · X

@gabugando · X

Ship your next project

u/Puzzleheaded-Log-27 · Reddit

Building a multi-model AI deliberation tool taught me something about trust LLM Counsel isn't another wrapper around one model - it sends your question to a panel of frontier LLMs, has them peer-review each other anonymously, and an impartial "chairman" model returns one synthesized answer. Free to start, pay-as-you-go after, credits don't expire. What I've learned so far: people trust a synthesized answer a lot more once they can see that the models actually disagreed and how that disagree

@ktat93 · X

A lot of things actually: 1. (qrcode generator - $120mrr) 2. (analytics soon + monitoring) 3. 4. (~10k visitors)