
Verdict · Hire on evidence. Put it in writing.
Compare candidates on evidence-cited dimensions and generate hiring documents.
facundobon · HN
Verdict – AI hiring verdicts where every score cites the CV verbatim
The full gallery
Tech stack
25 projects

Compare candidates on evidence-cited dimensions and generate hiring documents.
facundobon · HN
Verdict – AI hiring verdicts where every score cites the CV verbatim

Describe a startup idea in two sentences. Runles returns a model-estimated verdict, competitor context, and a phased plan before you build.
@asphramin · X

AI-powered mock jury simulator that watches six agents deliberate civil cases for attorney preparation.
@JJRjrESQ · X
Great idea. Vibe coded a jury simulator (Claude front/ back/Ollama local as the jury). Press "Run a sample, then "Call the jury to order."

One bundle. Three independent judges. Reproducible rankings.
@Imranmohsin18 · X
sites I’m working on: Please check out and give me feedback all are public showcasing my skills :D ( not selling anything atm )

A leaderboard with exactly one ranking signal: how much you paid to be on it.
@gettierone · X
A leaderboard with exactly one ranking signal: how much you paid to be on it. No votes, no editors, no algorithm. Bids accumulate and never reset.

Measure code review performance across GitHub teams with leaderboards and reviewer analytics.
u/SnooStrawberries827 · Reddit
my team had 47 open PRs and nobody was reviewing them, so I gamified it our team hit 47 open PRs at one point last month and nobody was reviewing them. tried slack reminders, deadlines, rotating reviewers, none of it really stuck. might be related to the fact that everyone's hyped about how fast AI can write code now, copilot cranking out entire features in hours, but none of that matters if the PR just sits there for a week. feels like writing code stopped being the bottleneck a while back

A leaderboard where you pay to rank and outbid others for top spots that last 48 hours.
@EricRodrig50655 · X
I built a pay-to-rank leaderboard site in one afternoon with Claude Code. The mechanic: pay more than whoever's #1, you take their spot. Get outbid, you fall. Every reign lasts 48h. No login, no algorithm, no jury — just Stripe.

Create weighted scorecards to make and defend B2B decisions in your browser, no account needed.
u/One-Relationship4349 · Reddit
Built a tool that turns messy decisions into defensible, weighted scorecards I kept running into the same problem: needing to make an important decision between multiple options, then having to present that decision formally. Spreadsheets held the numbers but produced nothing presentable. AI recommendations were fast but not reliably accurate enough to actually stake a decision on. So I built Claritrix — you set your own criteria and weights, score each option, and get an instant ranked res

Winnow scores every post in your X timeline as you scroll and highlights the few worth replying to. Local, deterministic, read-only.
@pfernan95dev · X
Want to grow faster on X? Try the tool I'm using and let me know if works for you🫶

Validate product ideas against public user discussions to decide whether to build, narrow scope, or pivot.
@_sunbo · X
I built ProductIdeaScout to help founders validate product ideas before they start building:

Compare language model performance at solving Redactle puzzles.
pampas · HN
Redactle LLM Leaderboard

Analyze chess games with natural language explanations using an open-source browser tool with no login required.
u/ICARUS_2X · Reddit
Spent 7 months building a FOSS platform for natural-language chess analytics (No LLM) Hey guys, I've released CHONSE2, an open-source game review platform that offers unlimited analysis and move explanations without using hallucination-prone LLMs, running entirely in your browser. chonse2.com But Lichess is free, so why use this? Some have asked. It expands on Lichess's feature set a few different ways: Full analysis (accuracy/elo estimations/eval graphs, etc) requir