@trackowork · X

@ThisIsRajat24 · X

everyone replacing notion with a vibe coded version right now. i did mine off trello. taskflow, free for everyone, not a clone, actually better imo. cost me more than i'd like to admit and still giving it away free :)

@wztlink1013 · X

自己写了一个工具，专为内容创作者多平台发布， 富文本编辑体验，同时支持多个平台的格式平替兼容。

sipsip.ai — 支持30+平台视频AI转录并提取摘要，订阅RSS可以每天发送早报

Voyagard — AI 学术论文编辑器，有 AI 编辑，一键查重降重，AI推荐文献索引等功能， 帮助你完成从选题调研，文献索引并管理， AI协助撰写等功能，帮助你轻松完成论文撰写

danielszabo · HN

Online editor with LaTeX, Markdown, LaTeX+Markdown Hybrid and WYSIWYG (MD only) support, AI assistant with resource lookup and anti-hallucination features, live collaboration and more fun things. Still in quite early beta. First institutional deployment scheduled in the autumn. Feel free to play around.

@divvsaxena · X

@ak14053 · X

@pdfproindia · X

@mr_wickedhacks · X

Write the doc once → get a notebook, slide deck, canvas, or resume from the same source. No rewriting for every format.

@harryjwang · X

I've used many of the major conference systems. Plenty still have docs as an unsearchable static site — or worse, as PDFs that stopped tracking the product three versions ago. Somehow, still true in 2026. We took an AI-first path with instead. Our docs are generated from the codebase itself. A custom Claude Code skill writes each page and retakes the screenshots whenever a feature changes — so the docs don't drift from the product. Every page still gets reviewed by a human before it ships. Now you can talk to them, too. We just shipped "Ask AI" over our docs: This feature also turned out to be a nice teaching case for agentic RAG vs. classic RAG: • Classic RAG: chunk → embed → vector DB → retrieve once, by fixed rules • Agentic RAG: hand the model a search tool and let it drive — write a query, read the results, rewrite, retry At more than 100 pages, still no vector database needed. And every answer cites the exact page it came from. #Age

@fedeponte1 · X

my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell