QWQ AI Assistant — 免费提供经过深思熟虑且富有详细推理的答案的 AI 助手，不需要登录

@sebuzdugan · X

building @getfrai , an open source toolkit that helps ML engineers navigate EU AI Act compliance, model cards, risk files, the boring but necessary stuff

parweb · HN

Detecting AI-written copy without an LLM (deterministic, client-side)

@comingupnachos · X

vibe coding, is my job safe V1 goal to show an optimistic future for those who prepare and start upgrading skills, ai won't take your job a human using ai might Not techy just learning

nadermx · HN

Referee.Chat - Set the goal. An AI panel works. Referee clears it done

@GetAgentHail · X

AgentHail — a control layer for AI agents to request approval, execute work, and return verifiable results. Would you sign up or leave?

u/Top_Succotash_6533 · Reddit

Roast this: Built a 12-archetype assessment + an AI you can talk your results through with Solo builder here. I've been heads-down on The Art of Soulcraft and I'd love this community's eyes on the experience — not the content. What it is: a self-reflection tool built around 12 archetypes. You can poke around the site using a sample assessment to get a feel for the flow. But the real payoff is Mira, an AI companion — and here's the key: Mira works off your own results, so to actually

u/Upbeat_Exam5410 · Reddit

Built an AI quoting tool for contractors — my neighbor was losing jobs because quotes took too long My neighbor runs a small moving company. Good guy, works hard. He kept losing jobs because by the time he emailed a quote, the customer had already booked someone else. He'd spend 20-30 minutes writing each estimate — pricing research, word it professionally, format it, send it. By the time it went out, it was too late. So I built QuickQuote AI. You put in the job details and GPT-4o generat

@romanbodnarchuk · X

Check out what I just built with Lovable!

@fedeponte1 · X

my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell

@emilsnotes · X

Our customers using Claude Code move faster than we can ship features. So we stopped fighting it and leaned in. Here's why it's paying off: 👇️ Some context: powers AI agents that answer millions of technical questions per month. Those conversations are a goldmine - they tell you exactly what users struggle with and where your docs fall short. We've built a lot of analytics on top of this (Coverage Gaps, Top Questions, and more), and teams love them. But here's the honest truth: no dashboard covers every edge case for every company. Meanwhile, our sharpest customers were already exporting kapa data and throwing their coding agents at it in ways we never designed for. So instead of chasing every workflow with a UI, we took the best practices we've seen actually work and packaged them as Kapa Skills - installable in Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex: 1/ Analyze Coverage Gaps: your agent works through the topics kapa couldn't answer and writes the missing content straig

@mukparekh · X

I built tool for fun. roast website Free. No signup