@RankPrompt · X

u/TasteMysterious5285 · Reddit

I built AI Census, a live field bulletin for how people are actually talking about AI models I’ve been building AI Census, a public “field bulletin” for how people are talking about current AI models. I kept running into the same problem: benchmark tables tell me how a model performs on a test, but not whether people are actually finding it useful, frustrating, reliable, etc. So I built a rolling view from public technical conversations across Reddit, Hacker News, Bluesky, GitHub, and Huggi

@bransburyx · X

@novascopeio · X

@JustinGarr90748 · X

We're building Cyberelf labs because a better score doesn't mean a better model.

u/momentzmania · Reddit

Reddit's API policy broke my product, but it's actually a blessing in disguise. My SaaS startup Vinespire was heavily dependent on Reddit's API for lead generation and boosting GEO, but I found out something that broke this dependency completely. Apparently, Reddit's API for commercial usage costs $12k annually, and what's worse is that only a very select few are accepted into their API programme. Mostly enterprises. My software is still in diapers and nowhere near the size

u/RockettBits · Reddit

I built a tool to check whether my websites are ready to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini A lot of AI SEO tools seem to work in a similar way. They send your site to an LLM and ask it to generate a score. The result can look convincing, but it is often hard to know what the score is actually based on. I wanted to build something more reproducible with findyouraiscore.com The scoring uses fixed rules based on published research articles around GEO, RAG, citation behavior and sourc

@Sathibuilds

@katyorby · X

i built — a local receipt for claude code runs. your check says whether the workspace passes now; the transcript supplies the activity counts. no transcript upload and no magical autonomy score.

u/Rabus · Reddit

I got TestingModels too overcomplicated over the month it is running: looking for some feedback how to make it more useful and simpler I run a benchmark like arena.ai , but with pre-generated prompts. So far, nearly 6k people came in and like 30k comparisons has been made - which means the thing is genuinely useful for people to compare the models. The problem is the more features i started adding the more overblown and complicated UI became - like old internet explorer tab bars Old: ht

malik_dixon1 · Product Hunt

TraceLogicAI: AI Architecture Evaluation Compare AI architectures with evidence, not guesswork

u/mrtrly · Reddit

I asked ChatGPT 20 different ways who could fix a half-built app. It never named my company once. I do codebase rescue for founders in exactly that spot, so that one stung. There are already plenty of tools that measure this kind of AI visibility, a CDN even ships one free, so I built mine mostly to see my own number, and it confirmed the bad news: near zero. The measuring turned out to be the easy part. What none of the tools do, and what I actually care about, is the fix: getting the mode