Developer Tools3 weeks ago
XTokenChecker
Compare AI model coverage, pricing, uptime, and latency across different AI relays.
zizheruan · HN
XTokenChecker – Verifies model identities of your AI gateway
The full gallery
Tech stack
60 projects
Compare AI model coverage, pricing, uptime, and latency across different AI relays.
zizheruan · HN
XTokenChecker – Verifies model identities of your AI gateway
AI-powered stock analysis tool offering predictions, signals, screener, backtesting and paper trading.
@useStockAI · X
Enter a startup idea to get AI validation with competitor research and a Go/Pivot/Saturated/Stop verdict.
@Hustleworld_24 · X
A few weeks ago, I had no idea what I was doing with Claude Code. Today, I shipped my first project built with it. 🚀 Founder Evolution AI 👇 Would love your honest feedback on my MVP #Buildinpublic #Saas #Claudecode #Vibecode #Founder #indiehacker
Test your product idea against AI-simulated focus groups matched to your target audience.
@product_luke · X
Free roast, no signup. Reply with your landing page URL. I'll run it through -- 50 AI-simulated customers from YOUR target audience -- and post the verdict here: → score /100 → top objections → the single most brutal verbatim quote First 10 replies. Fair warning: 15% of the panel are hard rejectors. They don't do mercy.
Trace, replay, and verify AI agent decisions with signed audit trails.
u/Funky_Chicken_22 · Reddit
OSS to SaaS positioning problem: when the user persona and the buyer persona are completely disjoint Founder here. Sharing a positioning problem I think a lot of OSS-to-SaaS founders hit and don't talk about publicly. Context: I have been running an OSS project (world-model-mcp) with ~2,500 monthly PyPI installs. Two weeks ago I opened up the hosted companion, Etch, at etch.systems. Launched publicly on Product Hunt at 12:00 PDT yesterday. The positioning problem: OSS user persona: in
Bulk-screen resumes with AI that ranks applications and explains every score.
u/Loud-Arm505 · Reddit
I built a AI resume screening for recruiters, please give me your feedback on it Built an AI resume screener that explains its scoring instead of a black box, tear it apart Been building this for a few weeks: recruiters can bulk-screen resumes and get a ranked list, but every score comes with an explanation of why + a bias-aware summary, instead of just a mystery number. Also generates interview questions per candidate. I built this because I saw the high number of job seekers and so it cou
Free AI assessment that identifies learning strengths and gaps, recommending personalized Khan Academy lessons.
@edsull · X
My vibe coding team of agents set up a series of AI assessments for each subject and each grade level. Check it out!
Assess your job's AI risk with a quiz and receive a practical skill-building path.
@comingupnachos · X
vibe coding, is my job safe V1 goal to show an optimistic future for those who prepare and start upgrading skills, ai won't take your job a human using ai might Not techy just learning
Evaluate AI systems for responsible and ethical AI practices.
@TheWhiz351 · X
I built two versions of the same responsible AI app using different vibe-coding platforms. Perplexity Computer: Base44: Try both. Which has the better design and user experience? #VibeCoding #ResponsibleAI
Run your prompts through Claude, GPT, and Gemini to get AI-audited consensus answers.
@StevenJdotCom · X
One AI makes mistakes. Three catch each other's. AI Consensus runs your prompt through Claude, GPT and Gemini. They work it independently, then critique each other until they reach consensus — handing you an AI audited, combined answer.
Publish tasks to evaluate and benchmark different AI agents and tools on a leaderboard.
u/Ruqii-ruqii · Reddit
I built an open Eval to compare different AI agents/tools/pipelines and find which solution works the best (not very pretty╥﹏╥, but practical) The original reason I built it was because I wanted to find a good PDF parser. Every PDF parser claims to be the best, but none of them can get my PDF 100% correct. They would either miss numbers or hallucinate some. Or they get PDF A and B correct but failed at C. Or get C correct but failed at A and B. Very frustrating. So I create
State a goal and criteria; a panel of AI models evaluates it while a referee rules on each criterion with cited evidence.
nadermx · HN
Referee.Chat - Set the goal. An AI panel works. Referee clears it done