@Dil_Lynn · X

@daogangtang · X

my claw team to help creators/OPC ship their app without the tech team. We help them build, deploy, and auto scale.

@sacsandc4 · X

@radimhfer · X

i'm founder of Stashbase, designed to help builders

tahazsh · HN

Hi! I’m Taha. In many agentic products that support workflows (including one I worked on), I noticed they either don’t support node-based editors, or use React Flow and go through the difficult work of integrating it into their product to run it and work with their existing logic. So I thought about creating a tool that could help with this by closing the gap between the editor and the runtime. That’s why I created Wayflow. The basic architecture is simple: you just need to create a graph (which is a JSON object) that the runtime knows how to run. The runtime doesn’t care where that graph is coming from, it just needs the right schema. And with the help of the editor, you can create the graph, and then export it or directly save it on your backend in your database. And then when you want to execute it, you just hand it to the runtime. The runtime can either stream the execution (which is useful for the editor), or give you the final result. How you execute the graph is up to you: t

othmanosx · HN

I still don't like the fact that AI is adding more stuff for us to read, it's accelerating the code production but slowing down the code review. I built my own code reviewer as well ( https://pyor.review/ ), surfacing the important stuff first is the right track, but adding more stuff to read is daunting, but asking AI to just point you to what you need to focus on and skim the noise is what I'm leaning more towards.

@tools_loop · X

@SajidAbuba74138 · X

A tool for developers

builderwrench · HN

Show HN: Free tool that shows what AI assistants see when they crawl your site

@GuidedBase · X

@mj_jimmi · X

u/surmado_rachel · Reddit

We built a cheaper code review tool for small teams We've been working on a code review tool for small teams, solo founders, and vibe coders who want a second set of eyes on every PR without paying Claude-level prices. The idea is simple: Surmado's Scout reviews your PRs against your own standards, not random generic lint rules. You add a STANDARDS.MD file, and on every push Scout gives you: What looks good/What needs work/A short reviewer brief so a human knows where to focus/Feedback