Blog · July 5, 2026 (updated)
The Vibe Coding Census — July 2026 (Vol. 2)
Every project in the One's Vibe gallery is live and gets fetched by our checker on a 15-minute cycle. That fetch leaves fingerprints — HTML markers, response headers, platform hostnames. Two days ago we counted 332 projects; today it's 449, the data runs deeper (public repos, source maps, Build Receipts), and the graveyard has its first residents. Here is the updated picture.
Next.js is the default, not a choice
Of the 449 projects we fingerprinted, 201 — 45% — serve confirmed Next.js markers. Everything else is single digits: Express, WordPress, Framer, Astro, Vite SPAs. The share held perfectly steady while the gallery grew 35% — this isn't an artifact of a small sample, it's the shape of the population.
We don't think 201 makers independently evaluated frameworks and converged. The AI tools did: Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and Bolt all reach for Next.js when you say “build me an app.” Vibe coding doesn't just change who builds — it centralizes how everything gets built. The default stack of the AI era is whatever the models were trained to reach for.
Hosting: the Vercel–Cloudflare duopoly
Vercel headers show up on 173 projects, Cloudflare on 153 (often as the CDN in front of something else). The classic indie stack of a VPS and nginx has practically vanished from this population: deploy is a git push or a prompt, never a server.
Builders build for builders
Developer tools and productivity apps top the chart — a third of the gallery. The first instinct of someone who just gained the power to ship software is, apparently, to fix their own workflow. Games, education and health are underweight relative to how often they're tried once published — an opportunity, if you're deciding what to build this weekend.
How they say they built it
New since the last census: Build Receipts mined from makers' own posts and public repos, with provenance tracked per field. 21 projects name the AI tool they built with — and the Claude family (Claude + Claude Code, 25 mentions) leads Cursor, ChatGPT and everything else combined.
Team size is knowable for 113 projects (from contributor counts on public repos, or the maker's own words): 79% are solo. Where we can date a repo from first commit to last push, timelines run from one day to ongoing — the modal vibe-coded project is one person, shipped fast, still moving.
Open source is the exception
Only 20 of 449 projects (4.5%) link a verified public repo — we check that every repo actually resolves before we count it; six more advertised repos that turned out to be private or deleted, and those don't count. Stars range from zero to ArtPlayer's 3,845 (a mature library whose site predates the vibe-coding wave). Another 10 projects ship their entire source map to production — which let us read their real file trees. Fun finding: two apparently unrelated projects had byte-identical dependency fingerprints. Same secret author? No — both were Laravel Livewire apps, and what we'd mined was the framework's own bundle. The fingerprinter now knows the difference.
Where these projects come from
87% of the gallery was first spotted on X — mostly in “drop what you're building” threads where makers announce their work. Show HN contributes a steady trickle, and a handful arrive from V2EX and direct submissions. If you want to know what people are building with AI this week, the answer is still: read the replies.
The graveyard is open
Live checking is the whole premise of this gallery, and it now has consequences on record. Two projects have already been buried: their URLs went dark and stayed dark — one within days of being published. Free-tier hosting dies fast. Three more projects are currently at risk (3–4 consecutive failed checks) and will join them if their makers don't notice. We never auto-archive on a single failure — but we do keep the graves. Visit the graveyard.
The flip side: we started tracking uptime streaks this week, and the longest continuous streak is already 7 days. Watch that number — a “Nd up” badge on a card is the quietest trust signal we have.
Honest caveats
- Fingerprinting is passive: we only read what the page and headers reveal on the liveness check. Server-rendered stacks that leave no client marker are undercounted.
- This population is curated, not sampled: projects enter through our discovery pipeline (heavily X-based) and an editorial bar that favors instantly-tryable products. Both skew the numbers.
- The earlier version of this census reported “98% usable without login.” That number came from default-valued fields, not observation — we've since nulled those fields and only report attributes we can actually confirm. Fewer stats, all real.
- Snapshot taken July 5, 2026. The gallery grows daily.
Browse the data yourself — every stack chip on Explore is a filter, and every project page shows its Tech Profile with per-fact confidence. Shipping something? It takes one URL.

“One's vibe, another's poison.”
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.