@hannah24_app · X

@Bim_evaporates · X

Check out DMs open

u/Most-Football-4401 · Reddit

AI is writing more and more of our code. I think that means we need to get much better at reviewing it. We have a lot of tools to practice coding (LeetCode, HackerRank, Codewars, and so on). But I see very little on practising reviewing code, especially code written by AI . I am aware industry is running to build tools for AI review AI written code (the fox guarding the henhouse). But I believe it is just a matter of time before regulators start slapping hands for doing so in regulated indus

@Aimenbuilds · X

- leetcode for hardware engineers! We map job postings of hardware roles 1-1 to course requirements!

@francis7_a · X

Building - learning tools for devs and student. happy to connect.

@KolhyP92244 · X

@GroundedIQ · X

GroundedIQ exists to close the gap between what a client asks for and what actually gets built. That gap is where projects bleed — in change orders, blown timelines, and the slow erosion of trust between a consulting team and the people who hired them.

@satulipa_ · X

My workflow: 1. Open Speckit → answer 5 questions 2. Get blueprint (PRD, DB, API, roadmap) 3. Take it to Cursor/Claude Code 4. Vibe code with actual direction Built with Next.js, Vercel, try it on

u/ComfortableCheap1669 · Reddit

I built a way to see the decisions behind an AI-assisted project, not just the final repo I kept running into a weird problem with projects I built using AI. Once the project is finished, GitHub shows the result pretty well. But almost none of the process survives. The first approach that didn’t work. The bug that changed the architecture. The point where I realized I was solving the wrong problem. The AI suggestion I ignored. Why v2 looks different from v1. You

@edgex11lz · X

@knutmt · X