教育学习1 week ago
openstem — code skills that finally stick
用 flashcards、测验和 AI 辅导学习编程技能，基于记忆科学。
@mkappworks · X
I am building lets connect
完整作品展
22 projects
用 flashcards、测验和 AI 辅导学习编程技能，基于记忆科学。
@mkappworks · X
I am building lets connect
免费平台，提供500+编程挑战、学习路径和实时竞赛
@sumitkdevcode · X
Jiki 通过编码游戏和挑战学习编程基础，适合 LLM 时代
@RahimNathwani · X
Not a direct answer but the guys at Exercism (non-profit that publishes really good and free programming language self-study courses) recently launched a separate site to teach junior programmers both vibe coding and software engineering fundamentals.
编写目标，AI代理（Claude、Cursor、Codex）分解并执行编程任务。
dudemanAtl · HN
PlanWright – A control plane for AI coding agents
在请AI修改代码前,先理解代码流程和应用连接。
@minmuner_devlog · X
Thanks for the feedback; I’m open to anything.
在GitHub pull requests上自动生成代码文档。
Aldasams · HN
Show HN: DocFlow – AI documentation updates for GitHub pull requests
VibeLint 为 AI 代理提供代码检查、权限控制和审批工作流。
@RElharrak39428 · X
用Pyor原生应用审查GitHub的PR，无需打开github.com。
othmanosx · HN
I still don't like the fact that AI is adding more stuff for us to read, it's accelerating the code production but slowing down the code review. I built my own code reviewer as well ( https://pyor.review/ ), surfacing the important stuff first is the right track, but adding more stuff to read is daunting, but asking AI to just point you to what you need to focus on and skim the noise is what I'm leaning more towards.
比较 git、Jujutsu 和 GitButler 在 Claude Code 和 Codex 代理上的性能。
videlov · HN
I was interested in answering this question so I built a benchmark comparing git, jj and gitbutler in agentic context https://vcbench.dev/ Disclaimer - I am a co-founder of GitButler
