@Startups_Map · X

@IamAlexCarter94 · X

Not mine to defend, but worth a roast: It tries to turn a founder messy progress into something a stranger can actually evaluate. Curious if you think that framing survives contact with a real investor, since that is where most of these tools fall apart.

@TheDillonPrice · X

for geo-flexible career seekers and for aspiring founders.

@AshirShaikEng · X

@RealPasternak · X

Tight on cash? Use rev-share collaborations to get what u need to scale instead of having to pay upfront sets it up for u automatically

@heynucleus · X

Weekend is here! Time to build something exciting with Claude Code or Codex or Lovable :) Let's go! #vibecoding #claudecode #Buildsomethingpeoplewant #buildinpublic

@Alex_Durston · X

Achieve your most ambitious goals. For founders and senior leaders.

@sndpdesign · X

An Autonomous GTM OS for Early-Stage Founders

@thebuildclub_cc · X

@antonyefanov_ · X

Shipping new features every day to

@yashrsuthar · X

u/Competitive_Tune_590 · Reddit

Every "startup idea validator" is AI now. I went the other way — real founders vote on your decision, and they can't see each other's answers. Type "idea validator" into Google and everything on page one is an AI that reads your pitch and generates encouragement. I've tried them. The feedback arrives instantly, costs nothing, and changes nothing — it's a language model telling you what founders in its training data would probably say. So I built the opposite on my platform ( LaunchPact — I