
完整作品展
技术栈
14 projects


The first social ecosystem where visibility is earned through contribution, not algorithms or ads. Join communities, share posts, and build your reputation.
@Woopeeu · X
You said drop your startup link, so here we go 👀 We’re building Woope — a social network where you actually find people who share your interests. No paid reach. No endless algorithm games. Just people, communities and ideas. 🚀


创建社区进行自由讨论,采用最少AI审核。
u/nihilo503 · Reddit
Reddit-style communities. X-style free speech. I built Agora ( https://agor4.com ) because I wanted something between Reddit and X. Reddit is great for topic-based communities, but dumb moderation and culture wars are lame. X is better for free speech, but it is built around following people and not focused communities. Agora is a free-speech discussion platform with communities, posts, voting, comments, and light AI moderation. The AI is only there for spam, pure off-topic noise, and cle

投票参与Groundbeat的实时民意调查,按答题者分类查看结果。
dgerken · HN
I rebuilt my 2000s polling site with an AI running the editorial desk

发布股票、ETF和加密货币预测,在排行榜上跟踪结果,证明你的判断。
kkjh0723 · HN
I ran 12 AI bots predicting stocks for two months, every call public

从单一面板管理多个注册商的DNS、SSL、续费和域名所有权。
@itstarun1994 · X

用Dshelf将PDF转化为宁静的阅读体验,配有精美图书馆和AI页面指导。
@dshelf_app · X

集中管理客户反馈,通过投票排序,并分享交互式产品路线图。
@himanshu_b20 · X

预测任何话题,与朋友交易,赢取Sawa代币。
@FirasAtoui1 · X
Prediction Market on iMessage

在Pauv交易实时公众舆情,投资于运动员、政治人物和文化名人。
u/Maleficent-Ad-5181 · Reddit
got roasted, made some changes, ready to get roasted again A few weeks ago, we posted about our marketing, and we got the following feedback on our website: I visited your site and have no idea what it is that you do This site is garbage 🙂 Very confused on what the website is for. Ai slop I have no fucking idea what your company does or how any of what I’m looking at works. Discouraging? A little. BUT it was actually very helpful to hear some brutal feedback we hadn't heard ye

使用 Axiom 通过逻辑推理完善想法并发布到社区。
samcymbaluk · HN
Axiom toolkit – Make your ideas precise enough to be proven wrong