
ScienceGraph — Citation Map Explorer
科学引文网络与论文的交互式WebGL可视化。
@lushptr · X
I feel really guilty for vibe coding this but it looks cool even tho it is really inefficient and broken you can use it too now I'll desloppify it after exams I swear
完整作品展
技术栈
23 projects

科学引文网络与论文的交互式WebGL可视化。
@lushptr · X
I feel really guilty for vibe coding this but it looks cool even tho it is really inefficient and broken you can use it too now I'll desloppify it after exams I swear

输入URL或ISBN快速生成多格式学术引用(APA、MLA、Chicago等)。
colin_peterson · Product Hunt
Corroba - Free, accurate citation Cite AI, Verify Links, How To Cite

Rixx 用 AI 搜索文档和网页,结果都带有源引用。
@Hitendraa_ · X

AI实验室交互式地图,按估值、地域和研究方向可视化展示。
polyphilz · HN
Neolabs.fyi – 100 new AI labs by research area, valuation, and more

检查 ChatGPT、Perplexity 等 AI 搜索引擎是否能引用你的网站。
grenzfrei · HN
CiteReady – Can AI search (ChatGPT, Perplexity) cite your site?

上传论文和科研项目,识别方法论漏洞、论证薄弱和引文缺陷。
@Havey1001 · X
公共数据被研究得多,并不等于没有创新。更关键的是问题设定、识别策略、机制解释,以及同类结论和引用证据链是否已被覆盖。投稿前先系统比对公开论文、专利和既有技术路线,能少走不少弯路。我们做了一个投稿前风险预审工具,专门把这些重合与薄弱点提前摊开:

VerusCite verifies citations in academic PDFs with AI extraction and database cross-checks. Flag hallucinations and metadata mismatches before you submit.
u/andy_p_w · Reddit
VerusCite — Verify Academic Citations Tool to evaluate whether citations in academic papers can be verified, have minor errors, or are likely AI generated hallucinations. submitted by /u/andy_p_w to r/SideProject [link] [comments]

将学术论文和草图转化为发表就绪的研究图表。

通过API抓取搜索结果和AI模型响应,获取完整来源和引文。
rbatista19 · HN
Generous free tier for SERP and AI web scraping

实时交互式新闻地图,展示150,000+个故事,按主题和媒体分类,每小时更新。
sach90 · HN
A live map of the news cycle, rebuilt hourly from embedded headlines

根据提示词自动生成带真实引用的完整学术论文。
@fedeponte1 · X
my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell

把文档转化成有引用出处的wiki,由AI独立验证答案。
u/Calm-Tomatillo-7770 · Reddit
Is vibe coding criticism fair? A lot of the criticism of vibe coding is fair. Too many projects look good in a demo then fall apart in production — weak security, missing edge cases, code nobody understands later. One of the biggest gaps is testing (or the total lack of it). I took both automated and manual testing seriously while building Brainary. Ended up with a testing-to-code ratio of about 1 to less than 3, plus a lot of hands-on checking. I think it turned out solid because of that.