
Seedream 5.0 Pro AI Image Generator & Model Compare
从文本或图像生成AI图像并比较多个模型的输出效果。
Seedream 5.0 Pro — 多模型 AI 图片工作台,支持文字生图、图片生图、复杂布局与多语言文字编辑
完整作品展
技术栈
31 projects

从文本或图像生成AI图像并比较多个模型的输出效果。
Seedream 5.0 Pro — 多模型 AI 图片工作台,支持文字生图、图片生图、复杂布局与多语言文字编辑

Compare today's leading AI models by price, intelligence and more.
@spectragai · X

在 leaderboard 上按官方基准对比 AI 大模型的性能排名
fcten · V2EX
做了一个大模型 leaderboard 网站 最近一个月 CodeX 疯狂送重置,token 根本用不完,顺手做点东西。 地址:[知行录]( https://leaderboard.cn/) 排行依据主要为模型官方基准测试成绩。非主观排名。 数据会持续更新。如果有点用,欢迎各位 v 友收藏~

对比和评估 AI 模型在编码、推理、代理和其他基准测试中的表现。
davidtsong · HN
Benchmarklist: track AI benchmarks (2.4k+), models, and capabilities

对比语言模型在 Redactle 谜题上的表现排名。
pampas · HN
Redactle LLM Leaderboard

用于比较230多个AI模型API成本的计算器。
ahmed_hassan7 · HN
CostPerPrompt – Live AI API pricing and real-workload cost calculators

检测API中转站输出是否与官方100%一致
@nodeloc_cc · X
🌈 7月,你好,MODELOC上线算力池。 MODELOC自上线以来,已检测2000余次,覆盖600+中转站,为众多AI用户提供的使用参考。 MODELOC近期进行了改版,上线了算力池及市场。 加入算力池 查看帖子: 用 MODELOC 便宜地调各家大模型:一次讲清它的价格体系

查看和对比主流AI模型的公众意见和基准评分。
u/TasteMysterious5285 · Reddit
I built AI Census, a live field bulletin for how people are actually talking about AI models I’ve been building AI Census, a public “field bulletin” for how people are talking about current AI models. I kept running into the same problem: benchmark tables tell me how a model performs on a test, but not whether people are actually finding it useful, frustrating, reliable, etc. So I built a rolling view from public technical conversations across Reddit, Hacker News, Bluesky, GitHub, and Huggi

XTokenChecker是一个AI模型目录,用于对比不同AI网关上的覆盖率、定价和延迟。
zizheruan · HN
XTokenChecker – Verifies model identities of your AI gateway

检测LLM API是否被降智或偷换模型,一键跑6项探针得出结果
cocodot LLM 降智检测 — 免费的 LLM API「降智/偷换模型」在线检测:填入任意 OpenAI 兼容端点的 base_url 和临时 API Key,跑 6 项探针(模型声明、动态题、能力完整性等)生成分项报告;Key 仅用于当次检测、不落库不留存,检测方法[开源](https://github.com/cocodot2026/cocodot-llmprobe)

在OpenVibeEval中对比不同AI模型生成前端代码和可访问性评分。
u/12qwww · Reddit
I built a live benchmark to see which AI actually writes the best frontend code Hey everyone! I built OpenVibeEval because I was tired of "vibe-checking" AI-generated frontend code. I wanted to know which model actually produces the most accessible and clean React/Tailwind output. What I built: •A leaderboard of 24 models (Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, etc.) ranked by axe-core accessibility scores. •A Harness Comparator to show how different system prompts change the same model's output. •

让AI模型通过3D动画展现香蕉植物的完整生命周期来比较性能。
fran-mora · HN
I gave 5 AI coding agents one prompt: grow a banana plant through its whole life in three.js: sprout, leaves, flower, fruit, rot, then pups that restart the loop. It's deceptively simple and yet very hard to get right from procedural code: you have to write working three.js and understand how the plant is actually built; how it hangs, ages and decays. Get the biology wrong and the code renders something weird. These are agents, not bare models (Claude Code and Codex for now). They can use tools, including playwright to check their work and improve it.