
Lagotto Meter — AI Readability Score
用自动可读性评分检查 AI 代理对您网站的理解程度。
tommy2970 · HN
Lagotto Meter – how well do AI agents understand your website?
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects

用自动可读性评分检查 AI 代理对您网站的理解程度。
tommy2970 · HN
Lagotto Meter – how well do AI agents understand your website?

根据已发布的代理标准评判AI产品,包含可检查证据和社区投票。
@katyorby · X
i built — a local receipt for claude code runs. your check says whether the workspace passes now; the transcript supplies the activity counts. no transcript upload and no magical autonomy score.

用AI根据具体性、证据质量和风险清晰度为创业想法评分。
@nellaiorgs · X
Building NELL Labs -- an AI-native startup validation platform. Instead of generic LLM answers, it scores your idea across specificity, evidence quality, risk clarity, and next-step usefulness, so you know if it's actually validated or just sounds good.

One bundle. Three independent judges. Reproducible rankings.
@Imranmohsin18 · X
sites I’m working on: Please check out and give me feedback all are public showcasing my skills :D ( not selling anything atm )

分析网站是 AI 生成还是手工编码,评分 0-100。
@mukparekh · X
I built tool for fun. roast website Free. No signup

通过对话评估来衡量和认证您的AI技能。
u/Ozan_D · Reddit
AISA - AI Fluency Assessment In the last 6 months I built an AI Fluency Assessment system (called AISA) - it's currently the most sophisticated (and popular) of it's kind. Has high fidelity in what we measure to both what Anthropic and US. Dept. of Labour agree as the markers of AI fluency. People chat with an AI agent uniquely trained to judge their AI fluency, get a detailed report and a breakdown of their AI skills, a certificate and a growth roadmap. We measure in 5 main dimensions.

用0-100 AGI分数对标前沿AI模型的基准性能。
baraklaniado · HN
I audited my AI leaderboard scale – every score dropped 6-15 points

检查您的网站是否已为ChatGPT、Perplexity和Gemini等AI搜索引擎准备就绪。
u/RockettBits · Reddit
I built a tool to check whether my websites are ready to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini A lot of AI SEO tools seem to work in a similar way. They send your site to an LLM and ask it to generate a score. The result can look convincing, but it is often hard to know what the score is actually based on. I wanted to build something more reproducible with findyouraiscore.com The scoring uses fixed rules based on published research articles around GEO, RAG, citation behavior and sourc

在几秒内审计您网站对ChatGPT、Claude和Perplexity等AI搜索引擎的准备情况。
@isreadyai · X
We help check if AI agents can read your site 💚 Free scan, no signup: — 32 checks in 5 seconds across GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Perplexity & more.

用 LLM 评估 AI agent 对话质量,提供评分卡和成本分析。
@tech_maju · X

Reader gives AI agents reliable web context by turning URLs into clean Markdown, structured JSON, crawl results, and browser sessions.
@nihal_was_here · X

检查你的 AI 应用的安全性、隐私和治理准备情况。
u/Budget_Lawfulness_33 · Reddit
I made a tool that bridges the gap between vibe coding and actually knowing what you shipped A lot of people are shipping things they don’t fully understand anymore. With the new flagship models such Claude/Codex and people spending hundreds on AI subscriptions to build faster, apps are being shipped quicker than ever. But when you’re constantly throwing prompts at AI, adding features, and moving fast, it’s easy to lose track of what actually made it into your codebase. So I built: https