@CliffDoomer · X

Those are great! Also I wanted to share this web app I vibe coded this week. A return to old school web surfing. Free.

u/RockettBits · Reddit

I built a tool to check whether my websites are ready to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini A lot of AI SEO tools seem to work in a similar way. They send your site to an LLM and ask it to generate a score. The result can look convincing, but it is often hard to know what the score is actually based on. I wanted to build something more reproducible with findyouraiscore.com The scoring uses fixed rules based on published research articles around GEO, RAG, citation behavior and sourc

@painterner · X

After a year away, I’m back to indie hacking. Built with Claude and GPT in two weeks, Disidea is my first launch of the year: four AIs debate your decisions in one thread. Try it: Questions? Ideas? Let’s build great products and make money. Who’s in?

@oleks_i · X

@intheworldofai · X

On the World of AI Bench (vibe-coding composite): Claude Fable 5 → 85.2 GPT-5.6-sol → 82.4 kimi-k3 → 81.5 Moonshot’s K3 just walked in and claimed bronze on one of the toughest coding-focused leaderboards out there.

@discorev · X

I've been working on - Using gpt-5.6-sol and Fable in Claude Code via CLIProxyAPI. I've found using these two together with Claude Code Workflows is a killer combination

cs_vertex · Product Hunt

SiteRoast AI Roast any website with AI in under 30 seconds

@anefthynos · X

u/FadsScales · Reddit

Finally Got a Paying Customer! For months I kept building features instead of talking to potential users. Nothing happened. I finally changed my approach. I simplified the product, started reaching out to small businesses directly, and focused on solving one problem really well. That got me my first paying customer, and seeing someone actually use something I built felt way better than chasing more features. The biggest lessons I learned: Launch before you think you’re ready. Talk to use

@TimEngng · X

Stop losing the "why" behind product decisions -

hubraumhugo · HN

Design slop is the feeling that tells you a website is purely AI-generated. This is an attempt to classify the design patterns behind it. Applying this scoring to recent ShowHN submissions shows that about a third of the submissions show medium to heavy design slop: https://slopcop.adriankrebs.ch/show How the scoring works: - A headless browser loads each site (Playwright) - A small in-page script analyzes the DOM and reads computed styles - Every pattern is a deterministic CSS or DOM check. There are false positives, but my manual QA run verified it’s maybe 5-10%. Is design slop bad? Not really, just uninspired. After all, the web was never about the fanciest design, and before the AI era, everything looked like Bootstrap. However, there is a difference between trying to craft your own design and just shipping with whatever defaults the LLMs output. And the same has been the case pre-LLM when using CSS/HTML templates. I guess people will get back to crafting beautiful design

@AhmedDionic · X

🚀 Update: ExtensionBids just got bigger. It's no longer just for Chrome extensions. You can now bid and rank: 🌐 Websites 🔌 Chrome Extensions 📱 Apps 👤 Social Profiles 🤖 AI Tools More categories are coming. Every project deserves visibility.