@stanley_human · X

I have reached 2000+ customers. Vibe coded tool I launched in early March. Now discoverable of ChatGPT.

@aminnnn_09 · X

ashaney · HN

Curio, a place for HTML files

@ImFabien · X

- feedback management and suggestion box with built-in churn insights for SaaS teams.

u/andy_p_w · Reddit

VerusCite — Verify Academic Citations Tool to evaluate whether citations in academic papers can be verified, have minor errors, or are likely AI generated hallucinations. submitted by /u/andy_p_w to r/SideProject [link] [comments]

@AsDavidi3g5 · X

Check out what I just built with Lovable!

colin_peterson · Product Hunt

Corroba - Free, accurate citation Cite AI, Verify Links, How To Cite

u/Ser_Duncen4126 · Reddit

Made a side project to organise the study material in college by creating study groups I've been working on a side project called StudyHubAI. The idea came from how difficult it can be to manage notes, assignments, and study material spread across different places. The app lets students upload PDFs and notes, ask questions based on their own study material, and get AI-generated summaries and answers. It also has study groups where students can share resources and discuss topics together.

windcor · HN

Cite Hustle – SEO agent that does your content marketing

u/Most-Football-4401 · Reddit

AI is writing more and more of our code. I think that means we need to get much better at reviewing it. We have a lot of tools to practice coding (LeetCode, HackerRank, Codewars, and so on). But I see very little on practising reviewing code, especially code written by AI . I am aware industry is running to build tools for AI review AI written code (the fox guarding the henhouse). But I believe it is just a matter of time before regulators start slapping hands for doing so in regulated indus

u/Puzzleheaded-Log-27 · Reddit

Building a multi-model AI deliberation tool taught me something about trust LLM Counsel isn't another wrapper around one model - it sends your question to a panel of frontier LLMs, has them peer-review each other anonymously, and an impartial "chairman" model returns one synthesized answer. Free to start, pay-as-you-go after, credits don't expire. What I've learned so far: people trust a synthesized answer a lot more once they can see that the models actually disagreed and how that disagree

@DesignDexx · X

organises and simplifies relevant research for designers to read, bookmark, and make informed design decisions — instead of relying on AI.