@VictorVDPN · X

chenglong-hn · HN

Data visualizations are the bridge between user and data. But building AI agents that can generate visualizations reliably can be very tricky: - simple chart specs can be reliable, but generated charts are often of low quality due to reliance on system defaults; - complex chart specs with explicit details can produce good-looking charts, but they are verbose and agents can struggle with reliability We figured out it is a limitation on the language issue (not just AI capability thing) -- current visualization languages are a bit too low-level for AI agents, requiring them to explicitly make visual decisions that are supposed to be handled by a good compiler. Flint is a visualization intermediate language to address this issue, allow AI agents to solve this last-mile human-agent interaction problem. It provides a simple semantic-type based specification, and contains a layout optimization engine that can produce good-looking charts (filled with derived low-level details) from simple

Smart Match AI — 自定义条件和精度来匹配两列不同的数据，更加自由的 Excel lookup/vlookup

davidtsong · HN

Benchmarklist: track AI benchmarks (2.4k+), models, and capabilities

mfisc_019 · HN

Countify – Collaborative No-code computer vision for labs

@AI_303030 · X

@RunXItApp · X

Synexa AI — 一行代码部署 AI 模型 (Replicate 50% 低价平替)，Synexa 是运行无服务器 AI API 最具性价比的解决方案，提供业界最具竞争力的 A100 GPU 价格，相比其他服务商可节省高达 62% 的 AI 算力成本 - [更多介绍](https://github.com/1c7/chinese-independent-developer/issues/47

@CADENZ0VA · X

🚀 Cadenzova helps turn your products into Pinterest & Instagram content with AI. 💾 Import products 📆 Schedule automatically 🧠 Learn what performs best If marketing takes too much of your week, I'd love your feedback.

@ashkans_dev · X

An ETL tool:

@fedeponte1 · X

my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell

@propelio_app · X

Hey man, Building Propelio, proposals for freelancers Let’s connect!