
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects


在 Slack、Teams、WhatsApp 和 Discord 中部署 AI 员工自动化工作。
@Cyndra_ai · X

部署理解业务逻辑的AI智能体来自动化企业工作流和统一知识。
@kr812345 · X
enterprise ai orchestration platforms to automate using tools. @

AI驱动的工程团队,规划、构建、测试和发布代码,具有人类监督。
@edgex11lz · X

AI联合创始人工具,帮助验证初创企业创意、打造演讲稿和制定商业计划。
@MiltosTzet · X
an AI tool that helps non-technical startup founders to structure their idea

Willie is the AI project manager inside Groundskeeper — she reads your documents, drafts the plan, surfaces what changed, and prepares client updates.
@groundskeeperpm · X

8页应用,管理销售线索并追踪客户旅程以优化业务运营。
@jozef_x1 · X
6 x designs, which one did I go with? vibe coded and designed in base44 by for

KiteArc AI 根据你的简历匹配科技职位,撰写求职申请。
mayurpawar · Product Hunt
KiteArc.com AI reverse recruiter

将商业问题转化为公司简案和可执行建设计划的AI原生操作系统。
@MarkZofMarkZ · X
- in process of updating it currently, making it better. How about you? What are you building?

与AI对话,查看置信度评分和完整推理过程
u/RayanBuilds · Reddit
I’m 18 and built an AI chat app solo. Tear it apart (brutal feedback welcome) Built this solo this year at 18. It’s called Veris, an AI chat + writing assistant. I know, “another chatbot” 😭. So I gave it stuff the big ones don’t. Favorite feature: upload an image and pick a mode: Normal (it analyzes it) or Debate (it actually argues with you about it). Not selling anything. I just want to know: what would an AI have to do for you to use it daily? submitted by

与团队工具集成的 AI 同事,自动生成报告和仪表板。
u/ForeignPiece4761 · Reddit
We rebuilt Luffy’s website — what should we improve, and what should we not change? I’m on the team behind Luffy. We’re building an AI coworker for teams of roughly 10–100 people that lives where the team already works (primarily Slack). The idea is not another chat box or a workflow builder. You give it an outcome, it learns the company context, works across tools, keeps going asynchronously, and only pulls a human in for decisions or approvals. It is also meant to be proactive: it notices

alink是一个AI代理,代表你回答消息和处理请求。
@xzensh · X
记 alink @alinkHQ 的第 n 次调整。 我把 丢给一个朋友,两天后他回复「牛啊,这个产品是不是比较超前啊,看了几遍才有点理解」。 一个懂技术的人需要看几遍,估计不懂技术的人看一眼就走了。 Fable 同学说,超前的不是产品,是叙事选择的入口。alink 把最超前的一层(智能体身份/关系/授权)当成了解释产品的入口,而它本可以只是信任背书。产品里最不超前的部分——「有人找你时,有个东西替你接待」——是千年老需求:秘书、前台、门房、答录机。AI 没有创造这个需求,只是第一次让个人也雇得起一个前台。 新的调整已经上线了,请帮我看看,如果你觉得还有问题或者有建议,欢迎通过 反馈。 对于高质量的建议我们赠送1年 alink Pro 会员。