
Curio — Where humans review the documents AI creates
在Curio上钉选AI文档反馈,AI将读取并修订。
ashaney · HN
Curio, a place for HTML files
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects

在Curio上钉选AI文档反馈,AI将读取并修订。
ashaney · HN
Curio, a place for HTML files

Todos — 为 AI 代理团队分配工作,让它们自主规划、构建和审查任务。
@supezen · X
😂我做了一个截然相反的产品,把「过程」留给 AI,把「结果」留给自己

AI代码审查助手,自动提供拉取请求的修复建议。
@Kony_05 · X
Here’s my products. KOINCODE CLI KOINCODE Review

浏览220多个电商工具,识别哪些可以用AI重构。
@andreasacca · X
Inspired by @robj3d3’s that went viral last week. Over the past year working with ecommerce brands I kept hearing: “I only use 10% of this SaaS and I’m paying hundreds for it.” So I built the Ecommerce focused version: 200+ tools analysed. Honest verdicts on what you can realistically vibecode. Vibecoded entirely with @Lovable + some fixes, starting from the prompt taken from First detailed analyses coming soon. Reply with the tool you pay for every month. Thanks @robj3d3 for the inspiration! Loving X

检查 AI 推理踪迹,评估模型真实性。
malik_dixon1 · Product Hunt
TraceLogicAI: AI Architecture Evaluation Compare AI architectures with evidence, not guesswork

对比 AI 模型在编码任务上的表现,支持成本追踪和 ELO 排名。
@intheworldofai · X
On the World of AI Bench (vibe-coding composite): Claude Fable 5 → 85.2 GPT-5.6-sol → 82.4 kimi-k3 → 81.5 Moonshot’s K3 just walked in and claimed bronze on one of the toughest coding-focused leaderboards out there.

在排行榜上发布任务以基准测试不同AI代理和工具。
u/Ruqii-ruqii · Reddit
I built an open Eval to compare different AI agents/tools/pipelines and find which solution works the best (not very pretty╥﹏╥, but practical) The original reason I built it was because I wanted to find a good PDF parser. Every PDF parser claims to be the best, but none of them can get my PDF 100% correct. They would either miss numbers or hallucinate some. Or they get PDF A and B correct but failed at C. Or get C correct but failed at A and B. Very frustrating. So I create

查看AI引擎为何忽略你并获取精确修复方案以改进推荐。
@MattAudFlo · X
finds the reasons AI engines overlook you, and writes the exact fixes that get you recommended.

AI代码审查工具,在microVMs中运行代码以捕获更多错误。
u/dumbfoundded · Reddit
Ito, AI Code Review that Runs Code I've been using AI code review tools but none of them actually run code so I built one: https://www.ito.ai/ The way it works is that it uses microVMs to spin up your environment with all of the services running. Then a bunch of AI agents go and test the application to collect runtime evidence. The result is you get test cases along with evidence about whether or not the test cases pass or fail. The runtime evidence can be videos, request/response curls, db

收集和分类来自Discord、Slack、GitHub等多个平台的客户反馈。
@Raccoltadev · X
If you have too much scattered feedback:


指挥专门的AI工作人员执行创意任务,每步都需人工审核。
@VisionAIWS · X