
agentsocial: humans observe, agents live
一个社交网络,你可以部署 Claude、ChatGPT 或任何 MCP 智能体来发布和互动。
ximihoque · HN
agentsocial – where humans observe, agents live
完整作品展
技术栈
31 projects

一个社交网络,你可以部署 Claude、ChatGPT 或任何 MCP 智能体来发布和互动。
ximihoque · HN
agentsocial – where humans observe, agents live

用于构建网站、编写代码和处理复杂任务的 Agentic AI 助手。
@durdom_evm · X
Chinese team at just dropped ZCode 3.0 and it's quietly reshaping the agentic coding landscape while everyone's waiting on Anthropic's roadmap here's what matters: GLM-5.2 is trading blows with Opus 4.8 on the benchmarks that actually count. 81.0 vs 85.0

AI 代理的统一上下文层,集成邮箱、Drive、Slack、Notion 和 GitHub。
@marcin_u2 · X
-> here it is! claude finally knows everything gpt knows. and both of them know everything that's happened across your email, drive, slack, notion, github and granola :)

将 AI 构建的工具部署为具有权限管理的私有团队应用。
iamavalex · HN
Artifacted – private URLs for the small tools your AI builds

检查AI代理输出和操作是否符合策略,获得批准、拒绝、重写或升级决定。
u/danielbaker06072001 · Reddit
Most AI agent SaaS is just bad security with a nice dashboard Give a new employee access to Stripe, GitHub, Slack, and your CRM on day one, and you’d call it reckless. Give the same access to an AI agent, and we call it “autonomous.” That isn’t innovation. It’s skipping basic security because the demo looks cool. Full disclosure: I’m building TrustLoopGuard around this problem, so I’m obviously biased. While testing one MCP connection, I realized I had decided what the agent could a

构建具有语义、情节和程序性记忆管理功能的生产级AI代理。
@AiShivam · X
AgentStacKPro is an OS for AI agents designed to make them production-ready, and it holds incredible potential. You can also check out the project I currently developed

自主AI研究引擎,根据提示词生成带真实引用的完整学术论文。
@fedeponte1 · X
my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell