
Stanley Studio — Edit your videos in minutes, not hours
Stanley是根据指令自动编辑视频的AI编辑器。
therealdanielpark · Product Hunt
Stanley Studio The AI video editor you hire that edits like a human
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects

Stanley是根据指令自动编辑视频的AI编辑器。
therealdanielpark · Product Hunt
Stanley Studio The AI video editor you hire that edits like a human

VibeLint 为 AI 代理提供代码检查、权限控制和审批工作流。
@RElharrak39428 · X


通过AI聊天界面一站式创建视频,自动生成脚本、配音和编辑。
u/Real-Estate-Agentx44 · Reddit
Built an AI video tool where one chat writes, voices, generates, and edits the whole video - is all-in-one actually useful or do you prefer separate tools? I've been building ViewPress AI , an AI video generator, and I'm at the point where I want honest feedback before I keep pushing in one direction. Instead of jumping between a script tool, a voice tool, an image/video generator, and an editor, you describe what you want in one chat and the agent handles the whole thing. It

开源Markdown编辑器,支持本地存储、跨平台和AI辅助编辑。
Markra — 本地优先的开源所见即所得 Markdown 编辑器,支持 Web、macOS、Windows 和 Linux,AI 修改可预览后应用 - [更多介绍](https://github.com/markrahq/markra/blob/main/README.zh-CN.md)

Surmado 自动代码审查工具,按照团队规范检查 GitHub PR。
u/surmado_rachel · Reddit
We built a cheaper code review tool for small teams We've been working on a code review tool for small teams, solo founders, and vibe coders who want a second set of eyes on every PR without paying Claude-level prices. The idea is simple: Surmado's Scout reviews your PRs against your own standards, not random generic lint rules. You add a STANDARDS.MD file, and on every push Scout gives you: What looks good/What needs work/A short reviewer brief so a human knows where to focus/Feedback

捕获UI元素及其代码上下文,与AI代理分享以调试视觉缺陷。
Loerei · HN
I found that describing where a broken UI is and taking screenshots for AI agents really sucks. I’m too lazy to explain an indescribable visual bug or capture a millisecond-long flash. I also don’t want to remember which file defines an element, whether it's right in the .tsx or a problem with the Parent Styles in .css. And even if you can point out the exact file, your agent still has to dig through thousands of lines of code to know what on earth you're yapping about. In a 7700-file monorepo like Cal.com, simply giving the right file in the prompt for your agent saves about 68.9% of execution time and 94.2% of the tokens your agent needs to digest. HoverSource gives all the needed information and further pushes it to -88.5% time and -94.5% tokens, basically skipping the entire digging session and jumping straight to reasoning and executing. The save is linear to how big your codebase is. I want to save tokens, but don’t want to spend my time and energy digging manually, and a junio

比较 git、Jujutsu 和 GitButler 在 Claude Code 和 Codex 代理上的性能。
videlov · HN
I was interested in answering this question so I built a benchmark comparing git, jj and gitbutler in agentic context https://vcbench.dev/ Disclaimer - I am a co-founder of GitButler


创建带有自定义徽标、颜色和使用情况跟踪的动态 QR 码
@IfeanyiArinze10 · X
What does What makes it unique?


探索并安装 Claude Code 自定义状态行脚本。
rsproule · HN
Share and explore custom Claude Code status lines