金融商业1 week ago
Особисті фінанси без хаосу: бюджети, цілі й грошовий потік
在 SpendShark 中追踪开支、预算和财务目标。
@Bogdan266624 · X
完整作品展
主题
已知属性
是透镜不是过滤器——只显示我们能确认的项目。
技术栈
457 projects
在 SpendShark 中追踪开支、预算和财务目标。
@Bogdan266624 · X
Bidventor 帮助亚马逊卖家优化产品列表和广告支出以增加利润。
@adeelimrani · X
审计您的Google地图评价，对标竞争对手，获取90天改进计划。
@ResenixOfficial · X
Hiii we are Resenix
Mailthentic 验证邮件地址和检查域名，改善投递率。
@mailthentic · X
LangevinAI 上传总账文件自动生成损益表和AI差异分析。
@VictorVDPN · X
与航空飞行数据交互，创建自动告警的AI监测智能体。
@yenalmh · X
Inslit 是 UX 研究平台，运行调查和可用性测试来收集用户洞察。
@inslit_ · X
Check out our User Research and testing platform: We have opened registrations for our testers. So go and be a tester at Inslit and get rewarded for your work.
搜索800万度假租赁，查看评价避免糟糕体验。
@4MikeJoe · X
CARFAX for Airbnbs!
发布前根据312个因素对社交媒体帖子评分。
u/Otherwise_Goose5292 · Reddit
I built an AI that scores your social post on 312 factors before you publish — roast my roaster Two of us are creators who got tired of the post-and-pray cycle: hours on a post, hit publish, hope, mostly flop, never know why. We realized the difference between our good and bad posts was never luck — it was hook, CTA, timing, caption. Fixable things. So we built Synthiya: paste a draft, pick your platform, and it grades it 0–100 across 13 categories (312 factors) and tells you exactly what t
在文本、图像、视频和音频中检测AI生成的内容。
@aicontentmeter · X
🚀 I just launched It's free to try, and I'd love your honest feedback. Use code JULY20 to get 20% off the Pro plan throughout July. What would you improve or add? Every suggestion helps! #BuildInPublic #AI #ChatGPT #SEO
查看 LLM 成本数据,按模型和环境分类,获取优化建议。
ATsimbalistov · HN
Show HN: Tracking GenAI cost and endpoint fragility so app teams don't have to
扫描网站的AI设计模式，评分其设计的AI生成程度。
hubraumhugo · HN
Design slop is the feeling that tells you a website is purely AI-generated. This is an attempt to classify the design patterns behind it. Applying this scoring to recent ShowHN submissions shows that about a third of the submissions show medium to heavy design slop: https://slopcop.adriankrebs.ch/show How the scoring works: - A headless browser loads each site (Playwright) - A small in-page script analyzes the DOM and reads computed styles - Every pattern is a deterministic CSS or DOM check. There are false positives, but my manual QA run verified it’s maybe 5-10%. Is design slop bad? Not really, just uninspired. After all, the web was never about the fanciest design, and before the AI era, everything looked like Bootstrap. However, there is a difference between trying to craft your own design and just shipping with whatever defaults the LLMs output. And the same has been the case pre-LLM when using CSS/HTML templates. I guess people will get back to crafting beautiful design