samcymbaluk · HN

Axiom toolkit – Make your ideas precise enough to be proven wrong

Dgeloe4-yb · GitHub

market-pilot Evidence-grounded market research prototype with traceable AI workflows.

@vkuoo · X

Added more demos showcasing graph-math relationships, built with Codex.

晨笙阅读 — 书籍解读平台，AI 辅助+人工校审，提炼经典书籍的核心问题、论证框架与实践洞见，支持分类浏览、全文搜索和主题阅读

@liam_carter_hq · X

@BiaoBuilds · X

我做了一个帮助读者拆解新闻论证结构的工具：LedeLens。 它不做事实核查，也不判断政治倾向，只回答一个更小的问题：文章的结论，能否由它自己提供的证据支持？ 在线体验： 感兴趣可以看看~

bayes-song · HN

Unlock Claude Sonnet 5's original reasoning

ashaney · HN

Curio, a place for HTML files

@TRACaveMan · X

@dropair001 · X

builder link: our team is shipping @o4Asol, a small Solana memecoin/community project with an interactive lab, reward mechanics, an AI council, a PFP maker, and a Living Wall. feedback on what feels clear vs confusing is welcome.

@fedeponte1 · X

my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell