
PaperBanana: Academic Illustration Generator for Methodology Diagrams
将学术论文和草图转化为发表就绪的研究图表。
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects

将学术论文和草图转化为发表就绪的研究图表。

Turn your business, audience and market into a strict Topic Map, page strategy, internal-link plan and prioritised SEO roadmap.
@pablomakes_ · X
Building → describe your project and get the keywords to target, the pages to create, internal linking map and a roadmap to build topical authority.

通过API抓取搜索结果和AI模型响应,获取完整来源和引文。
rbatista19 · HN
Generous free tier for SERP and AI web scraping

一个专注阅读学术论文的界面,支持笔记、阅读指南和间隔复习。
@houfu_chen · X
As a slight ADHD+anxiety, I tried to find a tool for reading papers, looking around for so long, non is working too well, so I vibecoded it. Now, let’s breathe, focus, and read. #vibecoding #adhd #anxiety #codex

实时交互式新闻地图,展示150,000+个故事,按主题和媒体分类,每小时更新。
sach90 · HN
A live map of the news cycle, rebuilt hourly from embedded headlines

用CompetitorSearch描述竞争对手,获得实时网络搜索的并排分析和档案。
@Wagner__kent · X
Good day Gainframe, built CompetitorSearch — describe your competitors, get a live web-searched side-by-side breakdown + full dossier on each. Selling it outright (Mistral+Tavily+Vercel, 156 visits/19 searches/10 users). Happy to walk you through it.

根据提示词自动生成带真实引用的完整学术论文。
@fedeponte1 · X
my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell

把文档转化成有引用出处的wiki,由AI独立验证答案。
u/Calm-Tomatillo-7770 · Reddit
Is vibe coding criticism fair? A lot of the criticism of vibe coding is fair. Too many projects look good in a demo then fall apart in production — weak security, missing edge cases, code nobody understands later. One of the biggest gaps is testing (or the total lack of it). I took both automated and manual testing seriously while building Brainary. Ended up with a testing-to-code ratio of about 1 to less than 3, plus a lot of hands-on checking. I think it turned out solid because of that.

将想法组织为视觉地图,提取关键见解并转化为文档和演讲稿。
u/shadowosa1 · Reddit
I rebuilt my landing page after 300+ visitors still didn’t understand what my app does. I’ve been building a spatial thinking environment called ThinkSpatial, and one of the hardest parts hasn’t been building the product. It’s been explaining what it is in the first few seconds. The basic idea is simple. You speak or type, and your thinking gets turned into a visual map instead of disappearing into a chat box, doc, or note-taking app. My first landing page was way too focused on showing h

提交主题以获取 AI 生成的研究简报,包括来源和引用。
@NoahSamson__ · X
Sam 🎓 — AI research assistant for students Drop your topic → get a full research brief in 60 seconds. Summary, sources, citations, unique angle. Delivered as a Google Doc to your inbox. Free for any student anywhere 🌍 →

@Joi2James https://t.co/EX6jR2itEt https://t.co/sXaN7QuPuY
@SamEkeNnamdi · X

ATLANIZE用AI搜索发现和整理研究论文,构建您的阅读列表。
u/rahmanbite · Reddit
Read research papers is funny but find the right one is challenging If I want read a research papers always time consuming: - visit the repository - start bunch of filters - download PDF, read it.. - then what next? reading history missing.. Why not use excel to save the link? this work again, I'm not happy :( and... how to make sure I read paper properly? no test, no judging.. right? Why not AI papers finder tools like SciSpace, Elicit or something like that? Again.. to