开发者工具6 days ago
Roastboard — climb the board, take the heat
Buy an AI roast of your app and climb the board. The top 10 get the spiciest, most shareable roasts.
@westerbamos · X
(inspired by
完整作品展
技术栈
60 projects
Buy an AI roast of your app and climb the board. The top 10 get the spiciest, most shareable roasts.
@westerbamos · X
(inspired by
发布SaaS创意获得创始人投票和AI评论。
@donidhernandez · X
I built three SaaS tools for bootstrapped founders. is the fun one
粘贴GitHub仓库，生成包含概览、阅读路径和流程图的AI入门指南。
@VirendraSi10558 · X
Top 30% out of 2,989 in the OpenAI x @namastedev_ Codex Hackathon 🚀 RepoPilot: turns any GitHub repo into a guided onboarding flow (analysis + AI explanations + diagrams). Planned with Codex, built with Claude Code. @akshaymarch7 @OpenAI #Codex
在 GitHub 上发现趋势 AI/ML 仓库，包含实时警报和提交热力图。
@g_saikumar_ · X
Real-time GitHub intelligence for developers, founders, and open-source enthusiasts.
ViralScope uses AI to explore social trends, discover content niches, get roasted, and connect creators with advertising opportunities across 11 pages.
@AndyCApps1981 · X
Get roasted 👇
List a public GitHub repo for free, or bid to climb above every free listing on the board.
@ashkans_dev · X
just for fun while the trend lasts :
永久存档GitHub仓库的流量、克隆和来源数据。
@resetnak · X
- Github Repository statistics for opensource projects! Give it a try
分析 GitHub 账户获取评分、徽章、编程语言分布和评价。
@w3ziqv · X
built GitScore — analyzes your GitHub activity and gives you a score from 0 to 1000+ based on commits, stars, impact, and global rank still early, would love brutal feedback
The viral, uncensored pay-to-rank leaderboard for GitHub repositories, open-source projects, and developer tools.
@OngDevLab · X
Greenline：实时追踪烧钱率、跑道和部门支出，一键生成投资方报告。
@greenlinebudget · X
financial tool for startups:
扫描 GitHub 仓库检查生产就绪度、安全性和可扩展性。
@nathanghart · X
Submitting for approval. I built a free tool for anyone about to ship a vibecoded app. It scans your repo for what bites you in prod (leaked keys, no auth, no error handling). I ran it on 1,868 AI-built apps and even caught my own scanner being ~42% wrong.