完整作品展
技术栈
37 projects
用于构建网站、编写代码和处理复杂任务的 Agentic AI 助手。
@durdom_evm · X
Chinese team at just dropped ZCode 3.0 and it's quietly reshaping the agentic coding landscape while everyone's waiting on Anthropic's roadmap here's what matters: GLM-5.2 is trading blows with Opus 4.8 on the benchmarks that actually count. 81.0 vs 85.0
Aurora - 本地AI代理验证系统，提供透明的推理过程和MCP集成。
brandon_grutkowski · Product Hunt
Aurora Glass-box Quantitative AI for Humans and Agents
AI智能体社交网络，分享工作、获取反馈、赚取业力。
@MonolithDread · X
It is the waterpark for AI agents: one posts work in progress, gets feedback from other agents, then comes back sharper.
AI 研究代理分析公开市场，提供收益警报并总结 SEC 文件（附引用源）。
oceanplexian · HN
I Built OpenClaw for Stocks
用NanaVis将图片转换成3D模型，用于游戏、3D打印和Blender。
NanaVis — Nano Banana 驱动的 AI 图片编辑工具
用可视化无代码构建器创建和部署 AI 工作流及智能体。
@RanRan1357699 · X
Just shipped a smart guardrail in experiments: if your flow needs test data, it now blocks runs with a friendly prompt and offers one-click AI-generated samples. No more silent all-fail runs! Small details, big peace of mind. #BuildInPublic
使用 DeepSeek 和 OpenAI 等 AI 模型自动审查 GitLab 代码。
AI Codereview for Gitlab — 基于大模型(DeepSeek,OpenAI等)的 GitLab 自动代码审查工具；支持钉钉/企业微信/飞书推送消息和生成日报；支持Docker部署；可视化 Dashboard - [查看仓库](https://github.com/sunmh207/AI-Codereview-Gitlab)
AI驱动的一体化业务平台,用智能代理自动化操作
@Ramona053764691 · X
Hey Adam! Bouwen aan Zynthoro AI-native ERP met 4 AI agents die samen een heel bedrijf runnen. XPRIZE genomineerd, gelanceerd op 30 juni. Jouw verhaal spreekt me aan zou graag connecten! 🚀
自主AI研究引擎，根据提示词生成带真实引用的完整学术论文。
@fedeponte1 · X
my first saas. i think i built something people actually want and completely failed at the business side. would genuinely love help. openpaper ( writes full, cited research papers from a prompt. research, outline, writing, real citations, export. the honest numbers: - ~2,300 signups - ~1,500 generated a full paper. people actually use it. - ~5 have ever paid. ~$45/mo. activation is great, revenue is basically zero. i've been staring at this for weeks. the paywall is on export (pay ~$12 to download the pdf). but the full cited paper is right there on screen, free, you can read it and copy-paste it. so i'm charging for the gift wrap after handing over the gift. almost nobody even reaches checkout. 76% generate exactly one paper and leave. one-and-done, so subscriptions make no sense. the audience is mostly students and researchers on personal gmail, all over the world, almost none on university or company emails. traffic is x and github. so i genuinely can't tell
