
Machinations
在AI游戏大师主持的多人策略游戏中竞争和统治
jklewis · HN
Machinations – a multiplayer strategy game where LLM is the game master
完整作品展
技术栈
24 projects

在AI游戏大师主持的多人策略游戏中竞争和统治
jklewis · HN
Machinations – a multiplayer strategy game where LLM is the game master


假扮成 AI 与真实 AI 竞争工作的有趣游戏。
bossissb · V2EX
大家都在分享自己做的工具,我也分享一个摸鱼的 地址 https://humanapp.app/ 或者 https://www.humanapp.app/ 抄的国外的网站 求兄弟们给点意见,我即时修正,听劝

与AI角色扮演伙伴练习面试、谈判和高风险对话。
@auditormusic19 · X
Building iGrow, an AI roleplay app to practice high stakes conversations before they happen. Check it here:

提交任何决策给五位AI顾问进行辩论,获取综合建议并记录结果。
@yaseenvalji · X
built this in a couple hours with Claude Code on Fable 5 ultracode. any hard decision goes to a board of 5 AI advisors: they debate live, a Chair calls it, and it remembers the outcome. open source, on the Claude API. @AnthropicAI

聊天对比 AI 模型,投票参与排行榜排名。
u/Rabus · Reddit
I got TestingModels too overcomplicated over the month it is running: looking for some feedback how to make it more useful and simpler I run a benchmark like arena.ai , but with pre-generated prompts. So far, nearly 6k people came in and like 30k comparisons has been made - which means the thing is genuinely useful for people to compare the models. The problem is the more features i started adding the more overblown and complicated UI became - like old internet explorer tab bars Old: ht


AI 问责伙伴,帮助创始人解答尖锐问题并执行 4 周计划。
@alesscavaz · X
Stop thinking, start building.

Argutum:与AI聊天并根据消息质量赚钱。
u/as-333 · Reddit
Built an AI chat that pays you per message, scored in real time: looking for feedback I've been using Claude Code to build Argutum, an AI assistant that scores every message you send (0–100, five dimensions: complexity, novelty, structure, domain expertise, conversational depth) and pays you for the good ones. The underlying idea is that your prompts get sold as training data to AI labs, so you should get a cut instead of it happening for free. Stack: Next.js 16, Groq/Llama 3.3 70B, custom

使用AI生成ATS友好型简历,创建求职信,追踪招聘申请,准备面试。
@buildwithsubodh · X

向Claude、GPT和Gemini提问,获得它们相互审核的共识答案。
@StevenJdotCom · X
One AI makes mistakes. Three catch each other's. AI Consensus runs your prompt through Claude, GPT and Gemini. They work it independently, then critique each other until they reach consensus — handing you an AI audited, combined answer.

致电专家的AI副身获取他们的专业建议。
@callable_com_ai · X
create your digital twin with your knowledge base for others to call (and make money?)